<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blogging Woolf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Focusing on Virginia Woolf and her circle, past and present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinking about Woolf and writing by Paula Maggio</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/thinking-about-woolf-and-writing/#comment-2803</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Maggio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 14:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/?p=1728#comment-2803</guid>
		<description>Thanks for adding those connections, Alice. Perhaps other readers will find more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for adding those connections, Alice. Perhaps other readers will find more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thinking about Woolf and writing by Alice</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/thinking-about-woolf-and-writing/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 00:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/?p=1728#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>Hi Paula - I saw 3 more Woolf-influenced novelists in the NY Times Top 100: Alice Munro, who has made direct reference to Woolf in a few of her stories as well as indirect allusion; Kate Walbert, who used Woolf in a couple of the linked stories that comprised her previous novel, Our Kind; and Margaret Atwood, who started Oryx and Crake with an epigraph from To the Lighthouse and cited Woolf a couple of times within the novel.  Alice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paula &#8211; I saw 3 more Woolf-influenced novelists in the NY Times Top 100: Alice Munro, who has made direct reference to Woolf in a few of her stories as well as indirect allusion; Kate Walbert, who used Woolf in a couple of the linked stories that comprised her previous novel, Our Kind; and Margaret Atwood, who started Oryx and Crake with an epigraph from To the Lighthouse and cited Woolf a couple of times within the novel.  Alice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What book changed your life? by Paula Maggio</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/what-book-changed-your-life/#comment-2797</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Maggio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/?p=1667#comment-2797</guid>
		<description>I went on a Dickens binge once, so I know what you mean. Ah, the power of the pen! Thanks for commenting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went on a Dickens binge once, so I know what you mean. Ah, the power of the pen! Thanks for commenting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Woolf&#8217;s Waves inspired solo piano ballads by Paula Maggio</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/woolfs-waves-inspired-solo-piano-ballads/#comment-2796</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula Maggio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/?p=1720#comment-2796</guid>
		<description>Hi, Iolanda. Good to hear from you. Please consider writing for Blogging Woolf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Iolanda. Good to hear from you. Please consider writing for Blogging Woolf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What book changed your life? by Margaret Solomon</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/what-book-changed-your-life/#comment-2790</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Solomon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/?p=1667#comment-2790</guid>
		<description>I think I would have to say &quot;Tale of Two Cities,&quot; because, at 15, I was enthralled by the Dickens&#039; narrative skill and locked on to English lit and never looked back . ..&quot;Antony and Cleopatra&quot; gave me a love for Shakespeare and poetry at 20...Later, &quot;The Feminist Mystique&quot; turned me into a feminist</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I would have to say &#8220;Tale of Two Cities,&#8221; because, at 15, I was enthralled by the Dickens&#8217; narrative skill and locked on to English lit and never looked back . ..&#8221;Antony and Cleopatra&#8221; gave me a love for Shakespeare and poetry at 20&#8230;Later, &#8220;The Feminist Mystique&#8221; turned me into a feminist</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Woolf&#8217;s Waves inspired solo piano ballads by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/2009/11/20/woolfs-waves-inspired-solo-piano-ballads/#comment-2757</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/?p=1720#comment-2757</guid>
		<description>thought I&#039;d come out of the lurk and say hi! it&#039;s been a while. I read the blog faithfully and it&#039;s looking wonderful- Iolanda (Rome)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thought I&#8217;d come out of the lurk and say hi! it&#8217;s been a while. I read the blog faithfully and it&#8217;s looking wonderful- Iolanda (Rome)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mrs. Dalloway is having a party in San Francisco by francessssca</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/2009/10/28/mrs-dalloway-is-having-a-party-in-san-francisco/#comment-2748</link>
		<dc:creator>francessssca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/?p=1656#comment-2748</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting this! I am in the show and was very excited to see a fellow wordpress.com blogger come-up when I &quot;googled&quot; our show!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this! I am in the show and was very excited to see a fellow wordpress.com blogger come-up when I &#8220;googled&#8221; our show!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review: The White Garden by Stephanie Barron by Margaret Gosden</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/review-the-white-garden-by-stephanie-barron/#comment-2741</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Gosden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/?p=1644#comment-2741</guid>
		<description>I am outraged by your acceptance of Barron&#039;s use of Woolf and Vita&#039;s White Garden to create a juvenile sort of mystery.  This blending of fact and fiction is a traversty.  Perhaps because I am a Woolfian I find it objectionable, but I also love a good mystery and this one is awful, with its dubious nuances about the interests of some people who are not alive to object or sue.  I say that a good novelist could do better by NOT using the crutch of 
much documentation, established by painstaking scholarship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am outraged by your acceptance of Barron&#8217;s use of Woolf and Vita&#8217;s White Garden to create a juvenile sort of mystery.  This blending of fact and fiction is a traversty.  Perhaps because I am a Woolfian I find it objectionable, but I also love a good mystery and this one is awful, with its dubious nuances about the interests of some people who are not alive to object or sue.  I say that a good novelist could do better by NOT using the crutch of<br />
much documentation, established by painstaking scholarship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What book changed your life? by Kevin Neilson</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/what-book-changed-your-life/#comment-2739</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Neilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/?p=1667#comment-2739</guid>
		<description>Plato, because one can write in richly metaphorical language without indulging in nonsense.

Kant, because one can write in disgustingly turgid prose without indulging in nonsense.

Schopenhauer, because he offers a plausible solution to the problem of life and a compelling aesthetic theory to boot.

Searle, because he&#039;s the best at analyzing the systematic connections between third-person biological processes and first-person conscious states.

Walden, because the daily bread of experience is our most important spiritual sacrament.

My Antonia, because setting, place, landscape matters; or characters are deeply rooted.

Little, Big, because the evocation of mood is an unplumbable mystery.

The Power of the Dog, because under-appreciated gems can still illuminate the darkest recesses of the mind.

Quixote, because Sancho Panza is eternal; and we are not.

Gilead and Home, because great taut skeins of light stretch between them.

Cheers,

Kevin
Between the Lines
http://jkneilson.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plato, because one can write in richly metaphorical language without indulging in nonsense.</p>
<p>Kant, because one can write in disgustingly turgid prose without indulging in nonsense.</p>
<p>Schopenhauer, because he offers a plausible solution to the problem of life and a compelling aesthetic theory to boot.</p>
<p>Searle, because he&#8217;s the best at analyzing the systematic connections between third-person biological processes and first-person conscious states.</p>
<p>Walden, because the daily bread of experience is our most important spiritual sacrament.</p>
<p>My Antonia, because setting, place, landscape matters; or characters are deeply rooted.</p>
<p>Little, Big, because the evocation of mood is an unplumbable mystery.</p>
<p>The Power of the Dog, because under-appreciated gems can still illuminate the darkest recesses of the mind.</p>
<p>Quixote, because Sancho Panza is eternal; and we are not.</p>
<p>Gilead and Home, because great taut skeins of light stretch between them.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Kevin<br />
Between the Lines<br />
<a href="http://jkneilson.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://jkneilson.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What book changed your life? by Martha</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/2009/11/04/what-book-changed-your-life/#comment-2738</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwoolf.wordpress.com/?p=1667#comment-2738</guid>
		<description>I love your response!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love your response!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
